Capacity and consent
LO: Describe the medico-legal position concerning consent in adults and in children, in both emergency and non-emergency situations and how mental capacity may affect this
Battery
- Wrong operation - incorrect site
- Unnecessary treatment - not clinically indicated
- Ignoring consent withdrawal
- Ignoring a specific prohibition against treatment - advanced decision
Competence
- Competent adult has the right to refuse medical treatment regardless of the consequences that may follow from the refusal
Valid consent
- Must have capacity
- Appropriately informed
- Given voluntarily - not under any influence
- Consent is a process not just completion
Capacity
PLUMB - MCA guiding principles
| Abbreviation | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Presumption of capacity | Most people can make some decisions |
| Least restrictive | Other ways to promote rights and freedom |
| Unwise decisions | Unwise |
| Maximise capacity | Time, pictures, language, adjustments to support the ability to make the decision |
| Best interests | Lack capacity, any decision made must be made in the best interest |
- Is the patient suffering from an impairment in the mind or brain
- Does that make the person unable to make a decision for themself at the time
Functional test
- Understand information related to the decision
- Retain information
- Use/weigh up the information as part of the process of making the decision
- Communicate the decision
Best interests
- Document how the decision was reached
- The reasons for reaching it
- Who was consulted
- What factors were accounted
- Second opinion/Ethics committee/IMCA
- Court declaration
Material risk
-
Would a reasonable person in the patient's position attach significance to the information
-
Consider effect on patient
-
Importance to the patient of the benefits/desire to have treatment
-
Alternative treatments
-
Risks associated with alternative
-
Reasonable alternatives
-
Must know about procedure
-
Accepted practice
-
Appropriate option, not a possible option
-
Not a variant of current treatment
Withholding information
- When patient says they do not want to know
- If disclosing would be seriously detrimental to patient's health
- Necessity - emergency and patient is unconscious
Treatment without consent
- May be justified by common law doctrine of necessity
- Emergencies
- Not practical to communicate with patient and treatment is necessary
- Patient's best interests
- Document the decision
Children
- Can consent to treatment - if they have capacity
- Lack capacity - need consent of person with parental responsibility or the Court
- Emergency treatment without consent in order to save the child's life
- At 16, it is legally presumed young people have the ability to make decision about their own care
Under 16
Gillick
- Parental right yields to the child's right to make own decisions when reaching a sufficient understanding and intelligence to be capable of making up their mind on the matter requiring decision
- Child does not have the right to refuse treatment
- People with parental responsibility or the Court can override refusal
- Disputes about treatment must be referred to the Court